Le mercredi, 13 avril 2016 à 17:09, Michael Grünewald a écrit :

> This is probably a rather minor problem, I guess. The presence of this support
> could be used to tie-break otherwise equally good solutions but is probably
> no show-stopper.

I'm fine with your proposal, but at the moment I'm constrained by what OPAM 
provides in its install files. So I think I'll move on with `lib` like META 
file do rather than `etc`. Now that I think of it `etc` should be rather kept 
for configuring the software itself.

If people stay with the defaults of topkg — and they should. This can be 
tweaked later in bulk if OPAM provides a better install destination alternative.

Best,

Daniel


_______________________________________________
opam-devel mailing list
opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org
http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel

Reply via email to