"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 14 Dec 2007 06:42:13 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote: > > ... > > Sorry, I can't see: which version of axiom would be preferred by > > the proposal above? > > > > The version of axiom that no longer exhibits the problem.
But I'd guess that would vary from issue to issue. And, apart of that, what's wrong with preferring a version that has an issue closed? I'd expect that it would rather be an impetus for the others to close the issue themselves, too. In fact, that's the reason why I propose the scheme: as you know, the only stuff I really can deal with are the algebra issues. Thus, given that my proposal is implemented, one rainy day I'd click on "closed in XXX" and I'd immediately see which patches have not yet been transferred to YYY and ZZZ. Since patching the algebra is mostly very easy (once the problem is solved), it is very little effort to fix YYY and ZZZ and thus have the algebra synchronized. Or, if I hit a bug in the version I use, say "ZZZ", I can look at IssueTracker and see *immediately* whether it has been solved in another version yet. I'd expect that cloning the issues will imply significant overhead. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
