Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Martin Rubey wrote:

> > Find below a list of issues where I have no idea of the proper status.  
> > Often
> > the main problem is that I do not understand what the bug is.

> > 110, 226, 378, 107, 112, 136, 302, 39, 17, 187, 228

here is another one: 51
> 
> I took a look at 110 and I think that this is not a bug report -- in
> this case IssueTracker is just used as a discussion forum.  I would
> just remove such pages from IssueTracker (and put them somewhere
> else in the wiki).

Thanks.  I closed the Issue and moved the contents to a new page,
SymbolsAndVariables.

> > Waldek, Gaby: is 370 fixed in FriCAS, open-axiom?  (I do not even know what 
> > the
> > bug is.

> FriCAS contains a patch by Steve Wilson to correct this problem.

OK, I added an appropriate message.

There remain 182 open bugs. 

Axiom Aldor Interface:       2
Axiom Compiler:             12
Axiom Library:              66
Axiom Interpreter:          31
Axiom User Interface:       20
Axiom Documentation:         8


Axiom on Linux:             10, I think these are all non-problems in FriCAS 
                                and Open-Axiom
Axiom on Windows:            7, ditto
building Axiom from Source: 13, ditto
DoyenCD:                     3, ditto
MathAction:                  7, ditto
lisp system:                 2, ditto

IMPORTANT NOTE: I did not put "fix proposed" statuses on bugs where the report
indicates - possibly implicitly - that only a certain version of axiom is
affected.

For me personally, the bad bugs are mostly in "Axiom Library".  Some recurrent
topics are, I believe:

* integration (346, 318, 360)

  (a workaround for the ones about special functions could be to implement gfun
  as proposed on the WishList)

* problems with the EXPR domain resulting from the fact that we do not have
  assumptions (or provisos, if you like).

* possibly related to the above two: problems with branch cuts of atan, asin,
  etc. (141, 138)

* factorisation problems (354, 269, 290, 254, 253)

* problems with limit computations.  This could be fixed by implementing
  Gruntz.

* problems with solve, which is really not very clever...

The other very bad bugs (for me, again), are with respect to aldor and the spad
language:

* I still do not have an aldor interface with fricas

* Axiom still doesn't understand dependent types

* Axiom still doesn't understand aldor extend

* SPAD cannot deal with conditional exports dependending on functions (354)

I'm very very curious to see what 2008 will bring!  All the best,

Martin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

Reply via email to