On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Martin Rubey wrote: | | Dear bug masters :-), | | so far I made all (well, mostly algebra) bugs that are fixed in FriCAS "fix | proposed" on IssueTracker. The reason being that I would like to see at a | glance which bugs are open, and with the philosophy that everybody could just | diff the algebra sources and get the fix from the FriCAS sources.
I believe that produces more work than actually help. There are growing differences that you cannot just require people to diff trees. If you want to make the Axiom Wiki The Issue Tracker for FriCAS, that is fine. But, don't tell us to go and diff it against other trees. | However, there are also important bug fixes in open-axiom. Gaby has added a | comment "fixed in OpenAxiom", which is fine. It is far more accurate than saying fix proposed -- because I don't think it makes sense for me to tell people to go and diff their trees against OpenAxiom to extrapolate a `proposed fix' -- I'm not saying they should not be doing it, but I don't think that qualifies as `fix proposed'. [...] | In any case, I dislike the situation as it is now - I do not want to see | OpenAxiom treated differently then OpenAxiom. But, you're already actively doing it. -- Gaby ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
