On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Martin Rubey wrote: | | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > Hi, | > | > I would suggest to use `fix proposed' on the Axiom Wiki only when | > a patch is effectly proposed as an attachment in the tracker, as | > opposed to the mere fact that the bug is fixed in an Axiom flavor. | > That would help reduce confusion. | | Oh, sorry, I overlooked this mail. I think that's a good suggestion, although | it does not make me happy, because it may be a lot of work to do so.
It may be a lot of work, when you do effectively propose a fix -- not just a comment that it is fixed somewhere. So, you could still maintain the level of work you're doing now by just saying it is fixed somewhere, without chaning to `fix proposed'. | In fact, | it only makes sense where the code bases are still close enough (i.e., the | algebra, I guess) | | How about splitting status fix proposed into | | 1) fix proposed (i.e, patch attached) | 2) fixed in one of OpenAxiom, FriCAS, Axiom (a shorter name would be needed here) | | ? That sounds good. -- Gaby ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
