On 05/14/2008 10:56 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> | That I could not write
> | 
> |    z: Integer == 3 + y
> | 
> | ("==" instead of ":=") was somehow a surprise to me, but I don't know
> | SPAD so well. So my question would be, how to use a delayed assignment
> | so that whenever I later call "bar(100)", z would be properly defined?
> 
> Every `==' definition in Spad implicitly defines a function.    There
> is no such thing for variables.

I know why I do not (yet) like SPAD: it differentiates between functions 
and ordinary variables.

For me functions are just ordinary variables or constants having a type 
that involves ->. But, in fact my knowledge of SPAD is so poor that I 
don't even know how do distinguish between (programming) variables and 
constants. So I will shut up.

Ralf

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

Reply via email to