> | I mean that if I can write: > | > | y := x + 1 > | > | and expect the compiler to provide an implicit type for y based on > | knowledge of x, + and 1 where all of these potentially overloaded, the > | number of possibilities rises rapidly. The greater the number of > | possibilites, the greater that chance of making a type error. > > what is the fundamental difference with > > y := x() + One() > > ?
Gaby, I don't understand your question. Be more specific. Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
