On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > ... > | > > | > OK, my understanding of your suggestion was different; see above. > | > But, if it is the case that the programmer -- not the compiler -- > | > has to do the manual declaration as Union, and manual insertion > | > of coercion, I don't see anything wrong about it: It is what we are > | > doing today. > | > Bill Page writes: > | No. Today there is a semantic error. > > We must either test different compilers, or different examples. Could > you remind me of which compiler and which example? >
All panAxiom compilers, the original example that started this thread: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=87k5hxyq16.fsf%40gauss.cs.tamu.edu Regards, Bill Page. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
