"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Bill Page writes:
| >
| > | On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > Bill Page writes:
| > | >
| > | > | On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | >
| > | > | There is a related problem with the definition of the domain
| > | > | 'Category' - is it a domain or a category?
| > | >
| > | > Category is conceptually a category, just like Domain is conceptually
| > | > a category.
| > |
| > | What do you mean by "conceptually a category"? As far as I can see
| > | Domain is a domain - not conceptually a category at all.
| >
| > Why?
| >
| 
| Simply because I can write:
| 
|   x:Domain := Domain

Is your definition that `T' is a domain if you can write

   x:T := ...

?

-- Gaby

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

Reply via email to