Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Is this really enough? Something like:
> |
> | DoD := LODO(EXPR INT, f+->D(f,x))
>
> Any good reason why ** and ^ should not be made syntactically
> equivalent, as opposed to duplicate definitions?
>
> Note that the interpreter already attempts such identification.
> My belief is that keeping the syntactic distinction is a good recipe
> for confusion and disaster.
>
I would rather completly get rid of **. Duplication is confusing,
keeping them different causes confusion, but making them equvalent
also will cause confusion (think of sombody trying to give a new
definition to ** but use old ^).
--
Waldek Hebisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
