Donald Winiecki <dwinie...@boisestate.edu> writes: | A change to the most recent licenses will make things consistent with | FSF's current way of thinking about open source, though more | aggressive developers seem to think it's restrictive. Given the | typical users and usual applications of GCL, this may not be an issue.
It is my opinion that GPLv3 goes a bit too far -- but I would dispute the label "aggressive developer" :-) | But I'm not sure -- if GCL is licensed under GPL3, does that mean that | anything built with or under it will also have to be licensed under | GPL3? (I guess that's why Camm is querying the Axiom list.) Indeed. That does have some implication for systems like the AXIOM family. If I understand correctly, it will be a move from LGPL to GPLv3? | And copyrighting GCL under the FSF seems like a reasonable idea, but | without Camm, GCL would be fairly well static, I think. well those are separate issues, I would think. Having FSF owns copyright relieves from some legal paperwork and burdens. That is largely orthogonal to who actually does the development work. -- Gaby ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
