On Sunday 19 Dec 2010 03:57:18 Arthur Ralfs wrote: > Hi Martin, > > In your scenegraph code you declare function signatures twice, for > instance in SCartesian.spad the Exports part has (via SPointCategory)
> Is this a stylistic preference? In adapting your code to OpenAxiom I > would tend to eliminate the second signature declaration except that, > since it's your code, I would consider deferring to your wishes on the > matter if you feel strongly about it. Hi Arthur, I still consider myself a newcomer to Axiom/FriCAS so I'm happy to go with the consensus amongst you guys and it would be good to have the most portable style between the panAxiom platforms. The only reason that I specified the parameter types in both the declaration and definition is that they tend to be in different files, or different places in the file, so it helps with readability to have a local indication of the type. But I can always put it in a comment so its not an issue for me. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
