Игорь Пашев <pashev.i...@gmail.com> writes:

| Though it is not a problem to have one more patch,
| OA could have a configure option like "--disable-cl-precise-test"
| 
| But let's wait for Konstantinos.

I forgot to ask: is it the case that debian does not support multilib?

(I know ArchLinux does)

   https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_FAQ
   
-- Gaby

| 
| 2012/9/15 Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@cs.tamu.edu>:
| > Игорь Пашев <pashev.i...@gmail.com> writes:
| >
| > | Thanks, Gabriel.
| > |
| > | Ok, I will ask Konstantinos again for build logs :-)
| > | And if he is correct, I think I will use a patch specially for Debian.
| >
| > it would still be better is such patch is in upstream so that you don't
| > have to maintain it separately.  Let me know if he is willing to test a
| > patch.
| >
| > -- Gaby
| >
| >
| > |
| > | 2012/9/15 Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@integrable-solutions.net>:
| > | > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Игорь Пашев <pashev.i...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
| > | >> Here is a Debian bug:
| > | >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687608
| > | >>
| > | >> <<on most other platforms, -m32/-m64 are not available as compiler
| > | >> flags. So configure fails.>>
| > | >>
| > | >> I think it is safe to remove those flags. As for Debian and Gentoo
| > | >> lisps are compiled with default compiler, so it is safe to use default
| > | >> compiler for OA. In difficult cases user (packager) can set CC of 
CFLAGS
| > | >> for configure:
| > | >>
| > | >> ./configure CC='gcc -m32'
| > | >
| > | > Hi Igor,
| > | >
| > | > thanks for forwarding the report.
| > | >
| > | > Unfortunately, Konstantinos is not right in his statement.
| > | > I don't know how he measured "on most other platforms",
| > | > but the flags is necessary for the following reasons: there
| > | > are many important platforms (for OpenAxiom) that are bi-arch, e.g.
| > | > can run both 32-bit and 64-bit programs.  Solaris, and earlier versions 
of
| > | >  Mac OS X, Windows 7 on 64-bit archi, and certain linux distros come to 
mind.
| > | > On these systems the available Lisp system may be built with
| > | > a certain CPU precision that is not the default of the C++ compiler.
| > | > For example, on Windows 7 (and Mac OS X notably), the Lisp system
| > | > may be built as a 32-bit application (think SBCL), whereas the C++ 
compiler
| > | > defaults to 64-bit; or the Lisp system may be built as 64-bit 
application
| > | > (think CCL) whereas the C++ compiler defaults to 32-bit.  Since we link
| > | > part of the C++ libraries into the Lisp image, we do need to have both
| > | > components built with the same CPU precision.
| > | >
| > | > Consequently, we can't just drop the -m flags.
| > | >
| > | > What might makes sense to do is to test at configure time whether
| > | > the available compiler understands the flags.  Unfortunately, I do not
| > | > have access to the machine that is causing trouble for Konstantinos.
| > | > Is he or you willing to test a patch and report?
| > | >
| > | > -- Gaby
| > |
| > | 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| > | How fast is your code?
| > | 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production.
| > | Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
| > | http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z?
| > | http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
| > | _______________________________________________
| > | open-axiom-devel mailing list
| > | open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
| > | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How fast is your code?
3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production.
Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

Reply via email to