Gabriel Dos Reis <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Aleksej Saushev <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gabriel Dos Reis <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Aleksej Saushev <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>> | Gabriel Dos Reis <[email protected]> >>> | writes: >>> | >>> | > For trunk (and therefore OpenAxiom-1.5.0) I would like to >>> | > require C++11 -- we've already switched to C++, but we >>> | > were using C++03. >>> | > >>> | > There are decent support for this version of the language >>> | > out there (e.g. C++, Clang++, EDG, etc.) My question to >>> | > packagers is whether it would be a problem -- especially >>> | > for the *BSD folks. >>> | >>> | Yes, it would be a problem, and not only on BSD systems. >>> | There're only few systems that use experimental GNU compilers. >>> >>> hmm, I am talking about GCC releases 4.6.x, 4.7.x, and 4.8.x. >>> Those are officially released compilers. Same goes for Clang++. >> >> Even CentOS uses 4.4 or even 4.2 as their main compiler >> unless they have changed it really recently. > > OK, thanks. This will be useful. > > PS: those rather archaic compilers :-) they are no longer > supported by the GCC team. The oldest being supported is the > GCC-4.6.x series.
There's difference between what GCC team considers "supported" and what vendors consider supported. I'm yet to see GCC version that works without involved tuning just to make it build. -- BECHA... CKOPO CE3OH... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
