There were implementations of C in Lisp. So C shares that formal logic
basis, or that it was discovered?

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Tim Daly <axiom...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm making progress on proving Axiom correct both at the Spad level and
> the Lisp level. One interesting talk by Phillip Wadler on "Propositions as
> Types", a very entertaining talk, is here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOiZatlZtGU
>
> He makes the interesting point late in the talk that some languages are
> "discovered" based on fundamental logic principles (e.g.Lisp) and others
> are "invented" with no formal basis (e.g. C). As he says, "you can tell
> whether your language is discovered or invented".
>
> The point is that Lisp has a formal logic basis and, as Spad is really
> just a domain specific language implemented in Lisp then Spad shares
> the formal logic basis.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> axiom-develo...@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

Reply via email to