Daniel Phillips wrote:
There are some nice tables on this site:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/informatos/carte%20graphique/Rage.html
Rage 128 does between 206 and 540 MPix/sec. I'll take a wild guess that it aligns roughly with what's doable in this FPGA.
Note that the 540 figure is for the Rage Fury MAXX, which is _two_ Rage128 Pro's on one board. Rage128 Pro by itself is the successor to the Rage128 (with the largest high-level differences a higher clockspeed and AGP 4x support versus 2x for the Rage128).
Regular Rage128 (GL that is) does 2 pixels/clock at 103Mhz for the retail versions and at 90MHz (or less) for the OEM versions. Rage128 VR was a cheaper version with only a 64-bit memory path. I don't know how that would impact this figure.
Earlier in this thread, someone posted a link to even nicer tables:
http://users.erols.com/chare/video.htm
In any case, yes, the 200 Mp/s seems okay. Less then that might be cutting it a bit close though.
Timothy:
I will vote against reply-to-list. Right now, both "Reply" and "Reply All" made mozilla reply _only_ to the list, which is not good. I had to paste in Daniel's address manually.
Rene. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
