On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:14:12 +0100, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fr, 2005-02-04 at 10:13 -0500, Timothy Miller wrote: > > I can't make everyone happy. Munging reply-to is a problem for those > > whom you want to reply to directly. However, I've been "plagued" with > > people replying to me directly with very insightful ideas that I would > > have preferred that they share with the list, but netiquette says that > > I can't just forward the email myself. In the spirit of sharing, I > > don't mind inconveniencing a few people. But if I get enough > > complaints and not enough counter-complaints, I will change it back. > > Now you're munging reply-to even worse, with it being set to you > personally _and_ the mailing list. What's up with that?
Good question. Gmail has the option to set reply-to to my address or to an arbitrary address, but I don't see how to disable it. > > Anyway, I'm also against munging it at all -- off-list people are going > to have a hell of a time, and I actually like getting duplicates > addressed to me personally as well as to the list, that way personal > discussions that are CC'ed to the list can be faster (no list involved, > but all material also goes to the list) and more convenient (mail filter > stuff...) Ok... so what to those who requested the change say to this? _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
