Hi Lourens, On Saturday 12 February 2005 08:09, Lourens Veen wrote: > On Saturday 12 February 2005 04:56, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Excuse me, I attached attached yesterday's code to today's email. > > Here's the updated code. > > Took me a while to realise, but I've found the problem. You get 18 > bits relative to the [1, 2) range, I get 17 bits relative to the > (0.5, 1] range. These are equivalent, because the exponent changes.
This stands to reason because your interpolation expression is the same as mine. I presume you've arranged for your multiply to be unsigned. There might be differences in the way the table samples are calculated, I didn't check that. The interpolation should be done in the [1, 2) range to match the range of the mantissa. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
