Le jeudi 24 F�vrier 2005 22:23, Jan Knutar a �crit : > On Thursday 24 February 2005 21:12, Timothy Miller wrote: > > > Under the GPL another company could take the RTL and base a product > > > on it, and be in the clear as long as they also release the RTL of > > > their product, I believe. > > > > Yes, and this is one of the concerns I have. I guess we can live with > > it if the other company does release their RTL. It's only if they > > DON'T want to release the RTL do they have to come to us and buy a > > license. > > How do you feel about a scenario, where a competing company would make > a nearly identical product, call it "clone", but without anything loaded on > it, so that the user could then download the image from techsource and load > it into the card and get themselves an OGRE (yeah I know it's taken :-( ) > clone? > > Even the boundaries between comercial and non-comercial use of the code > are blurry :)
The difference will be the same when you compare a 100� matrox 550 and a 40� ati 7500. The ati is more powerfull but is seen as crap. Analog quality could make the difference ! _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
