On Saturday 19 March 2005 17:16, Timothy Miller wrote: > You know, in order to initiate indirect DMA, you have to issue a > command through direct DMA. Perhaps we could have two commands for > that, one that allows priveleged commands, and one that does not. > I'm sure we could come up with situations where the kernel could > benefit from doing indirect DMA.
You mean, could benefit from putting privileged commands in indirect DMA, since it can already do indirect DMA like any other task. But I don't see any privileged command that makes sense in indirect DMA, unless you are thinking of register writes, which I'd rather just get rid of completely. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
