On Wednesday 30 March 2005 07:34, Vance Kochenderfer wrote: > Don't know if this is close enough to cause a problem, but there > is already an Aurora <http://www.auroravideosys.com/> in the > world of video.
Ouch! That is awfully close. Even if it's the company that's named Aurora rather than their cards, it's still a PCI card that processes graphics (video in this case) that is related to the name Aurora. I'm not a trademark expert, but I would be a bit uncomfortable with that. I think that with this the pros and cons of the different options as well as people's opinions about them are pretty much clear. We will probably never reach full consensus, so I'd like to suggest that Timothy and Randy make the decision. After all, the whole thing was Timothy's idea (and he does most of the work), and it's TechSource that has to sell the card under whatever name is chosen. In thet end, what matters is that we have a name, and can go on with more productive work :-). Lourens _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
