On Monday 18 April 2005 01:14, Andr� Pouliot wrote: > Andy Goth wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 11:31:04PM +0200, Lourens Veen wrote: > >>How about geometric solids? Cube, Pyramid, Cylinder, Sphere, Prism, > >>Torus, Tetrahedron...It gives a feel of mathematical and engineering > >>precision and it makes for nice clean cover art. > > > >Or the Barth Decic. Oh wait, SuSE already used that one. :^) > > > >So even mathematical shapes can have associated brand recognition. > > Why not Fractal in that case? Don't know a compagny who product as that > > name. And when you think Fractal you always think some cool graphics. :)
Hmm, and nature. What about flowers? Katinka Matson (http://www.katinkamatson.com/prints.html) makes beautiful images of flowers, and something similar could grace the logo. It's more beauty and perfection than reliability or coolness, but it may just be different enough to be interesting. Lourens
pgpytbmTRvdu1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
