On 8/28/05, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 28 August 2005 21:31, Timothy Miller wrote: > > On 8/28/05, Jack Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I still favor Clairvoyance, though. > > > > I think Clairvoyance is great. Have you checked it out for conflicts? > > Hmm. It does sound a bit new-ageish though. Or some other pseudo-scientific > psychic powers kind of thing. Not like a solid foundation for > experimentation...
It also makes us look like we're claiming psychic knowledge that we can't claim to have. :) _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
