On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Martin Jeppesen wrote:
Indeed, it sounds a lot more professional and business-like. I would take
"adapter" over "card" though. Just like we had the Color Graphics Adapter
and the Enhanced Graphics Adapter, we can now have an Open Graphics
Adapter (OGA). Then we get things like
To me, using adapter instread of card is now, so I can say with 100%
surdenty, that if I have never clicked on a link that contained adapter,
when I was looking for a card. To me an adapter and a card are two very
different things.
I have to agree here, for me an adapter is a thing you need to connect a
VGA monitor to a Sun Ultra1 with only 13W3 port. While a card is something
you set into your expantion slots on your mainboard. I would think that
most people have the same kind of thought about the two words, may not
include the hardcode hardware wizzies.
If picking between Card or Adapter, I vote for Card.
//Aho
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.kotiaho.net/~trizt/
ICQ: 13696780
System: Linux System (PPC7447/1000 AMD K7A/2000)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EU forbids you to send spam without my permission
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
