Ups. I cut away my own answer =)

(1) This Work is licensed under LGPL 2.0.  You have the right to use and
modify this Work, as long as you publish your changes to the Work.

Not LGPL 2.0 or newer?

(2) This Work is also licensed as a proprietary work, all rights
belonging to Traversal Technology.   Traversal Technology may use this
Work under those terms and has the right to publish, license, and sell
this Work and derivative works as they see fit.  To remove these rights,
you must remove this clause.

Should "work" -> "Work" in the first line?

(3) Use of this work without clause (2) forfeits the right to use any
trademarks owned by Traversal Technology, the Open Graphics Project, or
related organizations.

Should "work" -> "Work" in the first line?
 

(4) Patches, modifications, and extensions ("patches") to this Work
that are submitted to the Open Graphics Project, the Open Graphics
Mailing List, directly to Traversal Technology must be SIGNED by the
author of said patch, granting Traversal Technology "rights to use"
under clause (2), as well as clause (1).  Unsigned patches will be ignored.

Can extensions be anything besides patches? Or do you really mean only extensions written as patches?

On the 3. and 4. lines are modifications and extensions left out. On purpose?


_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to