On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:14:11PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
> > > (4) Patches, modifications, and extensions ("patches") to this Work
> > > that are submitted to the Open Graphics Project, the Open Graphics
> > > Mailing List, directly to Traversal Technology must be SIGNED by the
> > > author of said patch, granting Traversal Technology "rights to use"
> > > under clause (2), as well as clause (1). Unsigned patches will be
> > ignored.
> >
> > Can extensions be anything besides patches? Or do you really mean only
> > extensions written as patches?
>
> I was trying to collect patches, modifications, extensions, changes,
> and anything else together and give them all one name by which they
> are referred to later. Should I perhaps refer to them all as
> "changes"?
>
> >
> > On the 3. and 4. lines are modifications and extensions left out. On
> > purpose?
>
> Yeah, because "patches" was supposed to refer to them implicitly.
LGPL uses the term "modifications". I'd suggest using LGPL
terminology and definitions wherever possible, to avoid the need to
construct our own.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
