On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:42:10AM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
>
> We'll still probably use OG* names for graphics things, but the
> prototype board isn't a graphics card, per se. We still need a name
> for that.
Well, I suggested Bridgehead for that a day or two ago. This
afternoon I found a little time to look for conflicts. Basically, nothing.
USPTO has no trademark registrations at all for Bridgehead. Google came up
with nothing in computer graphics. There was something for game software,
but it was pretty obscure.
This leaves open the question of whether the development board
actually needs a name, since it's going to a small audience that will know
what it is anyway. I'm commenting on development board part numbers in a
different thread -- it needs a part number structure in any case so that
purchasers can order the exact configuration they want.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
