Although I hate to remove other people's hard work, I guess this stuff makes the top of the "naming" page obsolete. Is it time to delete it and just leave behind the accepted names?
On 9/15/05, Jack Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:02:33PM +0200, Martin Jeppesen wrote: > > > > Again I have to agree with you=) > > > > So to summerize. Would this be the syntex then? > > > > OG <A|C|D|P> - <[1-9] A|E|P> - <[1-9]-[0-9]-[a-z]> > > Pretty much. We probably don't need that first dash, because it's > in the middle of the family root number, and that string is fixed. The > details of the format after the root number are still somewhat hazy, because > we don't know exactly what options will be offered in each product family. > > > > > Please do. I'm not familiar with this item, but you know what it > > > is. > > > > > > I have added it to the frontpage. Is that a good place? > > > I think so. Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > Open-graphics mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com) > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
