On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 19:07 -0500, Timothy Miller wrote: > On 3/2/06, J.O. Aho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You mean like they done in XiG where you can run OpenGL remotly? > > I wonder what kind of performance impact is caused by the overhead of > X protocol to do OpenGL.
A rather odd result: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ glxgears 6871 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1374.190 FPS 6778 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1355.585 FPS 6680 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1335.941 FPS 6757 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1345.602 FPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ssh oberon /usr/X11R6/bin/glxgears 8016 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1603.200 FPS 4882 frames in 5.0 seconds = 976.400 FPS 8000 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1600.000 FPS 7676 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1535.200 FPS Zephyr is an Athlon-64 3200+ with an nVidia 440 MX laptop chip. Oberon is a Athlon XP 2000+. I did make sure all the nVidia special environment variables were disabled. I have no idea why running glxgears on a remote system over 100 Mb Ethernet over an SSH X-tunnel is faster than running it locally. Not that glxgears is that great a benchmark. No textures, for one thing. -- Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
