On 3/11/06, Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:55:11 -0500 > "Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'll wait until Howard sees the rest of what you said before > > commenting on it, but I can answer to this part. There are two > > problems with doing what you ask here. One is board space. The other > > is signal integrity. Whenever you route a signal to more than one > > place, you end up with reflections from unterminated ends, and these > > signals for the highspeed DAC are already routed to two places. > > I thought that this might prevent it.
That set of signals already goes to both the high-speed DAC and to the TV chip. You're asking for it to go to a third. > > > Keep in mind that if OGA has more than one head, what it can do won't > > be identical to OGD. If you're really intending to use OGD as a > > graphics card, you're wasting your money, or you're willing to spend > > the extra money for the highspeed DAC (which, relatively speaking, > > isn't all that much). > > I intend to use it as a graphics card. Why? Because if nobody > is really using it, then it will not be fully tested. I do not > care if it's slower than the end product or noisy or anything, > as long as it works :) Let's see if we can't get some monitor manufacturer to get you a couple of LCD monitors in exchange for some ad space on the web site. :) _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
