On Thursday 29 June 2006 18:56, Timothy Miller wrote: > On 6/29/06, Jussi Vainionpää <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. 1080i is an interlaced mode. > > > If it's to be deinterlaced, that would be done by the monitor/tv. > > > > Not all monitor can deinterlace and most don't do very good job. And to > > keep other features such as subtitles and menus constant it would be > > preferable to keep the output display mode constantly at the native > > resolution of the display. > > > > To me optimum sequence for 1080i would seem something like mpeg2 decode > > -> deinterlace -> scale to display resolution -> overlay subtitles, > > menus, pip etc -> output to display using DVI and avoid any processing at > > the display device. > > So, what you're really asking for is 1080p on the monitor, while your > MPEG is encoded as 1080i? > > Why not drive the monitor interlaced?
Same reason good tellies convert to progressive... Because it flickers. Hamish.
pgpl2NyIk8w6X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
