luc wrote:
Before you go to sleep, concerning the Artwork paragraph one should
better write that :
Luc pointed out that one of his logo designs was made for OGA not for
OGP **,and his TT logo** was a design especially for on an IC package.
As Rene said: It makes minimal demands on the resolution of the printing
process, so it will fit in a small space and still be recognizable
instead of :
/quote/
Luc pointed out that one of his logo designs was made for OGA not for
OGP. It was a design especially for on an IC package. As Rene said: It
makes minimal demands on the resolution of the printing process, so it
will fit in a small space and still be recognizable
/endquote/
Though, in my mind, I proposed the TT logo for Traversal as well. But
that doesn´t matter for me if it is good enough only for a stamp on IC
package.
Thanks. I have changed the wording to try and inform that the design was
for Traversal, and had been thoughtfully designed to take into account
the possibility of Traversal also shrinking it to fit on a board.
jb
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
