On 7/9/06, Patrick McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Though really, this is a kind of academic discussion. For as simple a syntax as this will have, setting up a compiler that access a configurable definition for line syntax would not be terribly hard. Still, having a single syntax will make it much easier for people other than the author to read and understand programs.
Seldom would a program be written in assembly. On the other hand, for debugging, programs would often (by developers) be READ in (dis)assembly. Perhaps we should develop a syntax that is designed to be easy to understand when read, and we'll compromise that only where we need to in order to make writing an assembler feasible. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
