> > As Timothy pointed out in his response, "free" has multiple > > connotations that cause all sorts of confusion, even with software > > which really can be free (as in beer) since. That's the main reason > > I have been trying to stick with "open" rather than free. > > I suppose that this is a good point. There is a problem explaining what > 'open' means also. But, English is an ambiguous language and I have no > cure for that.
Documented Hardware Foundation Freedom Hardware Foundation Liberty Hardware Foundation > What I had in mind is that the W3C can't tell Microsoft that they can't > be a member. If we think that we might have similar problems, the only > thing that can be done is to have a strong membership agreement. > Members that violate the agreement can be kicked out. There MUST be a way to keep known evil types out from the beginning. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
