Timothy Miller wrote:
On 7/11/06, Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ASSERT
beacause all it does is assert signals.
The discussion is not productive. If you want it to be ASSERT, then
make it ASSERT. I might only suggest that it be abbreviated. How
about "ASS"? :)
The only problem I have with ASSERT (other than Tim's smart ASS
abbreviation :)) is when no flags are set, you get:
ASSERT
Assert what?
How about: DELAY? It makes resonable sense in the context. We are
putting in a delay in the program flow to keep timing correct. All the
opcodes already allow for optional flag assertion on them, adding the
flags to DELAY doesn't mess up the perceived meaning as much as it does
with NOOP, and the abbreviation of DEL isn't so bad either.
Patrick M
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)