Timothy Miller wrote:
On 7/11/06, Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


ASSERT

beacause all it does is assert signals.

The discussion is not productive.  If you want it to be ASSERT, then
make it ASSERT.  I might only suggest that it be abbreviated.  How
about "ASS"?  :)
The only problem I have with ASSERT (other than Tim's smart ASS abbreviation :)) is when no flags are set, you get:

ASSERT

Assert what?

How about: DELAY? It makes resonable sense in the context. We are putting in a delay in the program flow to keep timing correct. All the opcodes already allow for optional flag assertion on them, adding the flags to DELAY doesn't mess up the perceived meaning as much as it does with NOOP, and the abbreviation of DEL isn't so bad either.

Patrick M


_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to