> >>> Yeah.  We want to be able to have every vconsole have any resolution
> >>> and depth it wants.
> >>    While wrestling with all these other issues, remember that some
> >> displays can't change mode.  Ain't physically capable of it.
> > 
> > Most displays cannot change mode.  High quality computer monitors are
> > fixed mode.  TVs are fixed mode.  The multi-sync monitors are the
> > anomaly.  Those LCD displays aren't really multi-sync, the panel has
> > a fixed resolution.  But the brain-damaged pee-seas expect a multi-sync
> > monitor, so the LCDs add some sort of scan converter, which raises
> > the cost of the display, and for what?  So you can have a crappy
> > looking display if you aren't using the native resolution of the panel.
> 
> Point taken AFA LCDs are concerned.  However, I don't think that the
> hardware scan converter adds a lot to the price

Looking at froogle, standalone scan converters start at about US$35
for one that can only do NTSC/PAL, and appears to jump to about US$280
for one that can do higher than NTSC/PAL resolution.  Subtract a bit for
the plastic box, connectors and wall-wart p/s.

And yet a US$150 LCD panel presumably contains a scan converter, and
one that does higher than NTSC/PAL resolution.  Something doesn't add up.

> OTOH, a QVGA LCD doesn't need an
> interpolating scan converter to display VGA.

How do you display 640x480 on 320x240?  Perhaps the answer would be useful
for TVs that don't actually resolve 720x480 (or the PAL/SECAM equivelent).

> However, the bootstrap problem remains.  If the Board can't read the
> information from the monitor, it needs to be able to display VGA on the
> monitor for configuration.

If the display supports the telling-the-graphics-chip-what-resolution-it-is
feature, but does not support 640x480, would that work?  Does pee-sea firmware
insist on 640x480 regardless?  Would the graphics chip convert?
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to