Le dimanche 15 octobre 2006 à 12:08 -0400, Nick S-A a écrit : > On Oct 14, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Daniel Rozsnyó wrote:
Nice project, yes, and the document is nice too. > The one problem is that there are many different types of interfaces > to LCDs and almost all have varying connections to the main board. I > am only interested in a single display, so it doesn't matter for me, > but if we are trying to sell a board that has an LCD interface, it > might cause unwanted havoc with people thinking they can just plug in > the LCD and go. Does the one problem imply to make a daughterboard for each different interfaces ? > > http://www.epanorama.net/wwwboard/messages/1911.html > This and numerous other sites continue to tell people that building > their own interface is not worth it, and they should just buy an > external monitor. If we integrated a laptop interface into an IDC > daughterboard, it would be very easy to get a large group of people > interested in buying the card. With the current number of I/O > available on the daughtercard, it would not be very difficult to also > have other extensions of interest on a pass-through board, or on the > same board as the LCD interface. > thoughts? It seems effectively interesting as laptop's LCD tend to be larger. More generally the IDC connector could be a mean to extend the OGD's market. Though, do you speak only about OGD1 or as well about OGC? Because, I don't know if OGC would have an IDC connector. > > > nick > > > _______________________________________________ > Open-graphics mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com) > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
