On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:04:39 +1300 Josephblack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/09/06, Timothy Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Converting YUV to RGB is computationally expensive, but splicing bytes > > together is not. We can support formats like xYUV and YUYV, but when > > it comes to more exotic formats (like where U and V are supplied only > > for alternating lines), we'll need some help from software. > > Any info about xYUV or YUYV for our Glossary? > http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=Glossary > (a google search didnt locate anything useful) YUYV: http://www.fourcc.org/yuv.php#YUYV YUYV is not much used anymore. Mostly because most vide codecs produce 3 seperate planes which means that they need to be packed before transfereing the image to the graphics card, thus consuming CPU and I/O bandwith. I don't know what xYUV is, never heard about it. And google doesn't show anything usefull. Where did you read about it? Attila Kinlai -- Lotus Notes ist eine verteilte Datenbankapplikation, als Sample ist eine miese Groupware dabei ;) -- Lukas Beeler _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
