Getting ahead of the curve.

It appears to me that if we use a bus interface for the chip that we will always be behind the curve. IIUC, nVidia is/was selling boards with a PCIe to PCI bridge to use their PCI chips -- behind the curve.

Sorry to get back to the graphics enabled northbridge chip, but this appears to be the best architecture to me. The Intel G965 would work, but this is just an example -- a ready made implementation of my idea.

The graphics northbridge has:

        Frontside bus interface
        VGA video controller
        Memory controller
        Video output.

that are needed.

This chip has an analog video output and 2 video expansion video outputs. It can support two monitors. I wonder if the analog video output is needed. IAC with a custom chip we wouldn't have it.

If we were to use the Intel chip, we would have a Pentium front side bus to which we would attach a system bus interface chip (AGP, PCI, PCIe, HTX, etc.) and the VGA BIOS ROM. It appears that it might be a good idea to also attach a MCU and additional ROM to configure the chip at boot and to make use of the built in graphics functions.

The Intel chip is very configurable and it contains a 2D and 3D video accelerator. It also has an interface to a southbridge chip which could be used to access other stuff.

If we were to make a custom chip for these functions, it would not need to be as configurable and it could include an interface for the Video BIOS ROM and a system space ROM.

So, if we were to make a custom chip it would have:

        Front side bus
        VGA video controller
        Memory controller
        Two serial video outputs
        ROM interface

Such a chip could have some graphics functions, or not.

What is the advantage of this architecture?

1. It doesn't have the system bus interface built in so it is possible to offer different system bus interfaces without making a new chip.

2. It might be possible to use existing commercial chips for the system bus interface.

3.      The architectures allows adding additional functions to the card.

4.      Multiple chips would take less cooling.

5. However, the major advantage of this is that you can add additional processors to the front side bus. You can add a MPU, ROM and multiple GPU chips to the front side bus.

The question is cost. Would a multiple chip board cost more or less to produce? IIUC, that depends on the volume being produced.

--
JRT
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to