I fixed the document and checked it in. Have another look.
On 4/26/07, Timothy Normand Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WHOOPS. Actually, that's not the mistake. The mistake is that there is no enq_ack. If you look at the timing diagrams, you'll see that !full serves the purpose of enq_ack. Thanks for catching that. On 4/26/07, Vinicius Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the text(and second code snippet), you have to check for > enq_ack and > not full, as is written in the code. Follows diff.
-- Timothy Normand Miller http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti Open Graphics Project _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
