James Richard Tyrer:
>Stephen Pollei wrote:
>
>>Do most people like nasm for an assembler or do you like another better?
>>http://nasm.sourceforge.net/
>>
>I prefer Intel assembler syntax because that is what I originally 
>learned.  I have a Borland assembler which runs on DOS.  I also have an 
>old MS assembler 5.x but it is a piece of junk.

from binutils 2.10+ gas has support for intel syntax using the
.intel_syntax directive. I'm just mentioning this in case we both want
Intel syntax and keep the toolchain down to a minimum, seing how
most of us probably have a version of gas installed already :)


Kenneth


-- 
Life on the earth might be expensive, but it 
includes an annual free trip around the earth.

Kenneth Østby
http://langly.org
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to