On 12/14/07, Kenneth Ostby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the danger of coming off as bikesheading. Could it be an idea to > have a "include" directory of some sort? I'm playing around with the S3 > side of the bridge now, and I'm seeing that a bridge.v header file would > be beneficial. I'm presuming that other parts of code could use the > same.
You are absolutely right that we need this. There are a number of comments in my code already that say "move this into a header file!" How about rtl/includes -- Timothy Normand Miller http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti Open Graphics Project _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
