Last week I posted to the Schmartboard mailing list
asking about more interface types for their system. I
made reference to sites like this and pleaded the case
of individuals wishing to make projects that interface
a little better than the methods available now. In
particular, I left an example of how this could
benefit an organization such as this. Neal
Greenburg(VP in sales) replied that they had been
kicking ideas around like what I was proposing for a
while, and that he would like to get some feedback.
So, if you're interested, head on over and pipe in.
The basic request I made was asking for common
internal pc interfaces(PCI, PCI-e, AGP, ISA, etc..) to
be included as an attachable card edge module.

The reason for my request was that this would allow
organizations such as this one to develop hardware
that is now unachievable at a decent prototyping
price(quantities in the single digits). Their modules
allow robust SMD hardware to be hand soldered and
connected to other modules, but interfacing to a pc or
other system is limited to rs232. At the very least it
would allow your organization to tackle a few
approaches at once, and keep the prototyping costs to
a minimum before commiting to any set board. I left a
much more in depth post there, and if you're
interested, you can find it there.

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/schmartboardsv/

I'm not affiliated with schmartboard in any other way
than as a customer. I'm sorry if this is seen as spam,
it's not intended to be. If the general consensus is
that this is spam, feel free to disregard this.

Thanks for your time, take care.



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to