Making a DAC, you better have an idea of what's the target market for it before even trying to make one. Considering all the one on the market I would probably say the only interesting reason to make one is if you are doing an asic and you need a DAC inside for some custom purpose. Else buy one it's way cheaper and easier.

On 2012-11-03 20:18, Timothy Normand Miller wrote:
An open source DAC is a worthy project. And there is demand for DACs. But can we make it a commodity prices? I think we'd have to do a full custom and make millions of them to make it cost-effective.


On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I'd rather design an open-source high-speed DAC silicon where
    you have control over all the transistors and can just make
    resistors exactly how you want them in silicon, instead of
    trying to deal with the unknown black box of driver stuff
    that's inside a digital I/O pins.

    If someone will commit to buying a lot of.. I don't know,
    10,000 DACs, then I can start working backwards from that
    and tell you how much they will cost and when you can expect
    to get them.

    What interface do you want on the digital side? I was thinking
    a Gigabit ethernet DAC would be a pretty cool toy.  ;)

    On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:17:41PM +0000, Jack Carroll wrote:
    > To make a parallel DAC that's monotonic and doesn't have
    oversize steps at the major bit carries, you need switches that
    introduce very small voltage errors (less than 1/2 LSB worth of
    voltage at the MSB carry) or else errors that are reproducible
    within 1/2 LSB from bit to bit.  Generic output pins from logic
    chips don't do that.  I've done some designs of fast parallel DACs
    with R/2R ladders and variant architectures, and getting the right
    switches and a stable reference rail is the biggest challenge.
     Doing it at a high update rate just makes everything tougher, and
    building it out of separate switch chips and resistor arrays just
    makes everything harder, because the physical size of the PCB
    interconnects between components adds stray inductances and
    capacitances.  If you can buy the DACs and line drivers, it's a
    lot easier.
    >
    > Jack Carroll
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Timothy Normand Miller" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > To: "Ing. Daniel Rozsny??" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:48:35 AM
    > Subject: Re: [Open-graphics] The next OGA card?
    >
    >
    >
    > Actually, if we have lots of I/Os to spare, we might be able to do
    > analog video using a resistor network and a low-pass filter.
     Someone
    > with a better EE background could answer that.
    > _______________________________________________
    > Open-graphics mailing list
    > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
    > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC
    (www.duskglow.com <http://www.duskglow.com>)




--
Timothy Normand Miller, PhD
Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Binghamton University
http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~millerti/ <http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/%7Emillerti>
Open Graphics Project



_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to