Skimming through [1], I found:
   "As an owner of a Zedboard (and half a dozen others FPGA boards) I
   recommend other readers disregard this advice. It is not a good starting
   board as is has a very, very steep learning curve, much steeper than any
   other FPGA I've used, It is also very, very expensive (but you do however
   get a lot for your $). The FPGA build times are very long too, especially
   annoying when you are just starting out.

   However, if you are interested in Programmable Logic logic, try a
   Papilio One from Gadget Factory - equivalent to a quarter of a million
   logic gates for a $37.50 + p+p.  An open source AVR compatible processor
   core is available, so you can still develop with it as though it is an
   Arduino, and even make changes to the internals of the CPU."

Google found [2]

"The Papilio is an Open Source FPGA development board based on
the Xilinx Spartan 3E FPGA"

As usual, the open source part seems... questionable. No mention
of BSD, Plan-9, Hurd, etc.  Closed source device driver, it mentions
an open source driver but doesn't provide a link.

"The Xilinx tools such as Impact and the EDK do not support FT2232D
based programmers nor does Xilinx provide any method to add support
for non-Xilinx programmers. "

I'm guesing the Xilinx tools are closed source. Various things are not
tested or outright not working.  Has anyone looked into this board?
Is it really usable, or just another board that promises more than
it delivers?

[1] 
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/13/01/28/2347255/ask-slashdot-best-electronics-prototyping-platform

[2] http://papilio.cc/index.php?n=Papilio.Hardware
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to