--- Dieter wrote:
And infrared remote, which can be handy for some applications.
---

This is something I have tried to figure out for a while -- why use
an infrared remote for a camera? The camera will see the IR if it is
accidently pressed during exposure. I would go with RF myself.

---
> 3.    Most of them have an optical viewfinders.  Video cameras don't seem 
> to have this problem since an EVF is considered to be a feature.

Why do you dislike an optical viewfinder?  Do you want to eliminate
the mirror flipping up and down?  The mirror flipping up and down
would be impractical for video, you'd have to use a beam splitter,
which reduces available light.
---

Canon made some mirrorless SLRs -- see the following wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pellicle_mirror

---
Does anyone make a high resolution display that is small enough
to use on a camera?  My video/still camera only captures 720x480,
even in still mode, but even so the viewfinder resolution is
a lot lower than that, so I can't tell how much detail I'm getting.
I suppose with the 12 Mpixel (or whatever they're up to this week)
sensors you can just assume you're getting a lot of detail, but I
can't assume that with only 720x480.  With video, even 1920x1080
isn't enough to assume you're getting the detail you want.
---

There are some small high resolution displays made by Samsung ---
there has also been some talk of OLED displays recently, but those are
really expensive.

---
> 7.    Autofocus has its uses, but it shouldn't be at the expense of usable 
> manual focus.  That is, digital SLRs have viewfinders that are not 
> really suitable for manual focusing.

IIRC optical viewfinders have special patterns in the groundglass to
aid focusing.  But above you say you want an electronic viewfinder.
I think manually focusing an electronic viewfinder would be problematic.
What I'd like to see is a good interface to allow the user to select
what part of the screen they want to be in focus.  And have a button to
semi-lock the focus.  The auto focus would still track the object if it
moves slightly, but is prevented from jumping to another object that
is closer/farther away.

Similar interface for auto exposure.
---
It wouldn't be too hard to have the lens on the EVF sensor (unless you are
using the main CCD, which you probably are, but whatever) put the standard
microprism structure in the middle, which would make it easy to focus even
in an EVF (just move the focus until the center is all the same color, just the
same as an optical microprism).
_______________________________________________
Open-hardware mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-hardware

Reply via email to