Nice work Bill! I think changing all the controller.xml for each of the Woodchip apps is the correct thing to do in this case. It sounds like you're really getting familiar with the framework. Hopefully I'll begin to get some traction as I just received in the dvds in the post--thanks for that too.
Perhaps now isn't the best time to be bringing this up, or maybe it is. I've always thought of woodchip as a release name more than the name for the project itself. But if you are thinking of it as the name for the project that's a-ok with me. If going with the former I'd probably have: org.openils.acq This way you can prepare for the day when there is org.openils.opac, org.openils.ill, etc--that was me trying to push miker_'s buttons. But seriously it would allow the first release of the acquisitions stuff to be called Woodchip, and then we could move on to Fargo, Sawdust or something...without having to change the java packages. I guess I'm a bit confused about where framework/woodchip would reside. Would it be svn://svn.open-ils.org/Woodchip/trunk/framework/woodchip? I think just getting them into revision control somewhere is a good first step, and then as the build process gets ironed out they may get shuffled around. I think we might want to hold off on putting all of opentaps into svn for the moment though if we can. I'm going to ping the opentaps user community and see how people typically manage builds of opentaps applications...if that sounds ok. //Ed
