It's been a while since I did a clean install from bare metal, and I did it
on Debian, but I remember the Makefile saving *a lot a lot a lot* of time --
the proper .debs are grabbed, and what's not apt-gettable is downloaded and
built.  So unless you have a compelling reason not to use the Makefile, I'd
use it.

jf

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Ryan Laverdiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>  What's the diffrence if I run the make file or just follow the install
> instructions on ubuntu?
>
>



-- 
http://libgrunt.blogspot.com -- library culture and technology.

Reply via email to