> Can't this be implemented using the hard and soft boundaries?  I'm disturbed
> if the answer is no because I certainly thought that was exactly the type of
> Use Case it was designed for.

A hard boundary just says, "never go past here", and a soft boundary
says, "if there's a potential item within the boundary, never look
outside the boundary" (and this never gets re-evaluated, so if the
potential item disappears, you're stuck).

-- 
Jason Etheridge
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  [email protected]
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com
 | Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org &
http://evergreen-ils.org

Reply via email to