To add to the thread Kathy posted, this has a few more responses
attached towards the end.
+1 March/September release schedule
No opinion on version numbering.
http://georgialibraries.markmail.org/message/2ofnmjgoku4zeng2
On 05/15/2012 12:51 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
any other months?
There was a bit of explanation for why those two months were chosen when the
End of Life policy was announced in December -
http://markmail.org/message/regauiczh6a3e2ro.
I support continuing with the March/September release schedules.
I have no opinion on version numbering.
kathy
-------------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 756-0172
(508) 755-3721 (fax)
[email protected]
IM: kmlussier (AOL& Yahoo)
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:open-ils-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lazar, Alexey
Vladimirovich
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:42 PM
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] After 2.2 naming / schedule
Any particular reasons for the March/September release schedule versus
any other months?
As far as versions, are there known pros and cons for either scheme? Is
anything wrong with the current scheme?
Alexey Lazar
PALS
Information System Developer and Integrator
507-389-2907
http://www.mnpals.org/
On May 15, 2012, at 10:46 , Bill Erickson wrote:
Hi all,
As we look toward planning the next release of Evergreen (after 2.2),
there are a couple of simple, but important questions we need to
answer.
1. Is it time to jump to 3.0 or do we stay with 2.3?
I'm not aware of any significant architectural changes (e.g. changing
PG versions) on the horizon, which would suggest we stick with 2.3.
Perhaps it's too early to tell?
For reference: http://evergreen-
ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning
2. Do we return to the originally proposed March/September release
schedule?
My impression is there's a general consensus to do this. It would
lead to a shortened development cycle for next release, so I would like
to give everyone a chance to voice their concerns / alternate
suggestions and put this to a vote.
Once we have these questions answered, we can start outlining a
schedule.
Thanks everyone.
-b
--
Bill Erickson
| Senior Software Developer
| Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
| phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: [email protected]
| web: http://esilibrary.com
--
--
Anoop Atre
| Systems Administrator
| [email protected]
| 770-709-5595
Equinox Software Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
--
"Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens"
~ Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller
